Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 8361"

1. On September 28, 2019, around 18:54, the Defendant stolen the 19,000 won of the market price, which was the victim’s possession at the display stand operated by the victim BK in Michuhol-gu Incheon, Michuhol-gu, Incheon.

2. On October 24, 2019, around 18:52, the Defendant, at the same place as the above Paragraph 1, took a theft of the amount equivalent to 22,000 won at the market price owned by the victim who had been displayed at the display stand.

"2019 Highest 8942"

1. On October 29, 2019, around 15:20 on October 29, 2019, the Defendant, in the Michuhol-gu Incheon AE, in the victim’s AF store operated by the victim BM, and in the display stand of BN, was stolen by gathering several breads equivalent to KRW 7,100,00, in total, at the market price of the display stand.

2. 피고인은 2019. 11. 7. 11:36경 제1항에 기재된 AF 매장에서, 그 곳 진열대에 있던 시가 합계 11,000원 상당의 샌드위치 2개, 시가 1,300원 상당의 꽈배기빵 1개를 들고 가 이를 절취하였다.

The Defendant, around 00:10 on November 2, 2019, 200:20 to 20:10 on the BP path located in Michuhol-gu Incheon BO; and the victim Q laid away from the victim’s market price, which was 50,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 8361"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of BK;

1. All CCTV images fagics "2019 high-class 8942";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of BM and BN;

1. Each CCTV photograph "2020 Godan288";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of Q;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV closure photographs and investigation reports (CCTV image investigation);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As long as the sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was imposed on the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing, the Defendant committed each of the crimes in this case, and the Defendant.