beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The accused committed the following crimes under the state that the accused lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental illness:
[2018 Highest 4414 - thief]
1. At around 14:00 on November 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by putting the victim’s first floor “C” store under the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B by using a gap in which the victim D’s surveillance was neglected; and (b) putting it off in the display stand, the market price of which is equivalent to 59,900 won.
2. On November 26, 2018, at around 15:38, 2018, the Defendant: (a) saw one spawn and one spawn of the market price equivalent to KRW 3,000 and one spawn of the market price of the Victim G owned by the victim G, which was located outside the Marart in the Mart located outside the Mart in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul.
[1] On January 16, 2019, around 16:20 on January 16, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the “J” store located in the route of transfer of I Station 1, located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, the Defendant stolen one of the red fluoring 10,000 won at the market price, which is owned by the victim K, suffering from his/her crepane caused by his/her creshing of visitors.
[2019 Highest 796]
1. On February 25, 2019, at around 13:33, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim L, which was under the ground of the I station transfer section located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, one of the saw saw saw saw 1,500 won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, located in the display stand.
2. A theft against the victim N was stolen by the victim N in the underground space of the I Station transfer section located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the date and time indicated in paragraph (1). “O”, which was operated by the victim N in the underground space of the I Station located in H, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, caused the theft of the victim N, at the end of one thousand and five hundred won market value, which was the victim’s ownership.
3. 피해자 P에 대한 절도 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시경 서울 영등포구 H에 있는 I역 환승구간 지하상가에 있는 피해자 P이 운영하는 ‘㈜Q’ 매장에서 피해자의 감시가 소홀한...