1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are all the plaintiffs, including the costs incurred by the supplementary participation.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In around 2003, the Defendant established the first comprehensive plan on the development of Jeju Free International City (hereinafter “the first comprehensive plan”) pursuant to Article 222(1) of the Special Act on the Establishment of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and the Development of Free International City (hereinafter “Special Act on Jeju”).

The period of the first comprehensive plan of this case presented 10 years from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 201, 6 sectors, such as the New Station Park Creation Project (hereinafter “instant Park Creation Project”), as the core project, and shopping alet, etc., as the strategic project.

Among them, the content of the instant park creation project is to build a tempha park in connection with the new history and tourism of the East and West, which reflects the emphism and history, in the West-si, Seopopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

B. After the launch of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province around December 31, 201, the period of the first comprehensive plan as mentioned above expires on December 31, 201, and the second comprehensive plan as to the development of Jeju Free International City (hereinafter “the second comprehensive plan of this case”). The period of the second comprehensive plan of this case is 10 years from around 2012 to 2021, and it analyzes the progress and problems of the first comprehensive plan of this case, and proposes new strategic projects based on the results of the evaluation thereof, and establishes a convention center and shopping themec accommodation facilities for tourism.

C. On the other hand, the intervenor was involved in the planning of the first and second comprehensive plan of the instant case as the implementing entity of the instant park development project, and the implementation and implementation of the project. On October 8, 2014, the intervenor filed an application with the Defendant for approval to revise the implementation of the instant park development project, and the Defendant conducted the development project of the instant park development project on November 27, 201 of the same year.