logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.02 2017가합557427
징계처분 등 무효확인
Text

1. Each inorganic measure taken by the Defendant against Plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H on July 20, 2017, and limited abandonment to Plaintiff I.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a school juristic person established pursuant to the Act on the Establishment and Operation of M University, and the Plaintiffs are students attending M University. (2) From around 2007, the Defendant promoted the establishment of the 2 campus as part of the long-term development plan of M University.

On June 1, 2009, the Defendant concluded NM University No. 2 Campus on June 1, 2009 to create NM University No. 2 campus and drafted a general eight-time memorandum of understanding, a basic agreement, attached agreements, and a concession agreement on August 22, 2016, such as entering into a concession agreement for the creation of NM University No. 2 Campus with NM University.

3) On October 10, 2016, M University Total Student Association convened a general meeting of students of M University on the ground that the Defendant’s participation was excluded and independently promoted the N Campus development project. Of 1,980 students present at the student general meeting, 1,480 students present at the N Camp development project plan is consenting to the withdrawal of the N Campus development project plan, and 1,000 students present at the 1,98 students present at the N Campus development project, and agreed to the agricultural nature of the building located in the N Camp (university headquarters building, P Dong), the rest of the Plaintiffs except the Plaintiff K and L occupied the Defendant’s administrative office building on October 22, 200 (hereinafter “the first occupation”).

A) On March 11, 2017, the first occupation was terminated at around 17:00, and the first occupation was terminated at around 17:00.4) Even after the first occupation, the Steering Committee of the Total Students’ Association of MUD decided on April 23, 2017 that the Defendant still does not guarantee the students’ right to participate in the Ncamper development project.

The Plaintiffs, at around 19:40 on May 1, 2017, entered the building by destroying the second floor glass window of the administrative officer as a watch, etc. in accordance with the above resolution.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second occupation”). 5 The Defendant shall consult with the Plaintiffs for the resolution of the problems related to M University Nampus and the restoration of trust.

arrow