Text
A fine of 3,000 for each of the crimes of No. 9 to 12 in the sight table of crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant and the crimes of No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant. 3,000
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 11, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in October due to interference with business affairs by the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 19, 2018, and is still under suspension of execution.
1. On October 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force from around 20:0 to March 14, 2018, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by drinking a total of 12 times during the period from around 2018 to around 2018.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the restaurant business of victims by force.
2. On February 25, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who was urged to return home from H to the site after receiving a report from 112 on the restaurant proprietor in front of a restaurant located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, and called to the site after receiving a report from 110.
Doz. Doz. Doz.
Pursuant to this paragraph, I would like to die.
“Preamble,” and the Secretary I’s request to the police officer, “Chewing, four police officers.”
The term "" refers to "one fingers, and the body has been extending out as it is as I's eye several times.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of public order.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made in relation to I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, and D;
1. A written statement of Q;
1. A report on investigation (a detailed statement of processing a report);
1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (formers and attachment of court rulings, etc.);
1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act, respectively, shall be applicable to the criminal facts.