logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.03.28 2018고단7037
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 22, 2017, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million with a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on April 7, 2008, a fine of KRW 700,000 with the same crime from the Jung-gu District Court on April 7, 2008, and a fine of KRW 1 million with the Seoul Northern District Court on December 22, 199.

On October 19, 2018, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition regulations on drunk driving twice or more, once again, driven D automobiles under the influence of alcohol of about 0.142% of alcohol alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver's license at a section of about 100 meters from the 05:37, 05:37, Do following the C-Myeon Office to the 100-meter parking lot of the above C-Myeon Office.

"2019 Highest 217"

1. On January 6, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) at approximately 500 meters away from the Defendant’s house located in the Shinsi-si Population E to the front road of the wife population in G, and without obtaining a driver’s license, driving a D Kan-ri car without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. Around 07:10 on January 6, 2019, the Defendant was required to comply with the measurement of alcohol by inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol, smelling, face, and eyeing, while driving a car with a car with no fluence in front of the wife population, while drinking alcohol, from the police officer H who belongs to the police box of the Gangseo-dong Police Station, while driving the car with no fluence in the influence of alcohol.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused to take a drinking-free measuring instrument in a manner that does not put the breath of breath while living together with a dog, and did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking-free measuring instrument without a justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 7037"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on detection of violations of the Road Traffic Act;

1. The place as a result of measuring the blood alcohol concentration;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow