1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendant’s KRW 36,154,461 and its interest on the Plaintiff on June 1, 2013.

Based on the facts, at around 07:20 on October 15, 201, the Defendant: (a) driven a B Damast Cor (hereinafter “instant vehicle”); (b) neglected the front road located in Chungcheong C to the Fside from E to Fside; (c) neglected the front road; and (d) caused the injury of G drivers, i.e., having the left side of the instant vehicle running toward the left side from the right side of the direction of the instant vehicle, caused the instant vehicle by shocking the left side part of the instant vehicle into the front part of the instant vehicle; and (b) caused the injury of G to obtain blood transfusion, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiff entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with G-owned H New Car. The Plaintiff paid KRW 90,807,360 of the insurance money for the damage incurred due to the instant accident to G, based on the relationship with which the instant vehicle only subscribed to liability insurance.

G was hospitalized at the G University Hospital from October 15, 201 when the instant accident occurred, and thereafter was hospitalized at the G Hospital. On January 19, 2012, K Hospital was hospitalized in the diagnosis, such as flaging, flaging, flaging, dementia, flaging, and waste collection, and died on May 26, 2013.

【In the absence of dispute, the ground for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 4 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), the inquiry result on the Lane of the court of the trial, the inquiry result of the fact-finding with respect to the Korea Compensation Medical Center Chairperson of the court of the trial, the judgment as to the ground for the claim as a whole, as a whole.

A. According to the above basic facts, the defendant caused the accident of this case by neglecting the duty of care in driving the motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle, and the accident of this case G caused the injury of blood transfusion, etc. after the accident of this case. The defendant is liable to compensate G for the damage caused by the accident of this case, and the plaintiff has an agreement on subrogation of the insurer under the insurance policy pursuant to the proviso of Article 729 of the Commercial Act.