logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.09.02 2016고합457
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 00:10 on June 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) considered that the victim went on a F-business taxi operated by the victim E from the shooting distance prior to the D Hospital located in the Busan Yagu, Busan, and the victim went back to the vicinity of the Hansung apartment located in 109 according to the Busan Yagu at the time when the victim passed; (b) considered that the victim was partly going back to the direction of part of the route; (c) once the victim was taken once the face of the victim's face, twice the head was taken back from the said taxi; and (d) continuously driven the victim while the victim escaped from the said taxi; and (d) caused the victim's injury, such as catum fat, which requires medical treatment for about 14 days, by drinking the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a driver of a vehicle in operation and caused the injury.

around 00:03 on March 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as assaulting the chest of the said J by hand, when the Defendant, a police officer belonging to the Busan Summer Police Station I District, was asked to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case, etc., who was called out after receiving 112 a report that the Defendant would avoid disturbance. (b) On March 20, 2016, the Defendant: (c) was able to ask the police officer belonging to the Busan Summer Police Station I District; and (d) was able to ask the Defendant questions about the circumstances of the instant case.

The Defendant continued to commit assault against the police officer as above, and continued to be called out from the slope K, a police officer belonging to the same patrol unit, who was called out after being requested by the J for the reason that the Defendant committed the assault against the police officer, and was able to take care of the said K’s chest at once.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted J and K, which is a police officer, and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

"2016, 457"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. "Criminal place, photographic materials, injury diagnosis report, and each investigation report (No. 4, 6, 23, and 25 No. 55)".

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to J and K;

1. Lritten statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (No. 4 of the evidence list);

1. Criminal facts;

arrow