Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from a dangerous driving) and engages in driving of a vehicle B.
On May 21, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on May 21, 2017, and led the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu roads to proceed to the front side of the Incheon High School as a light view from the Myeon of the Incheon High School.
At the time, it is night and the vehicle is possible to pass or park. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly manipulating the front door, the left and right, and the steering system, the steering system, the steering system, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and parked on the front of the vehicle and brought about the part of the victim D (53 Do) driving E in front of the vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant, with the upper part of the left front of the vehicle.
In the end, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, such as in-fluoring, in an inaccurate, unfluoring, red, etc., suffered from the injury of the Defendant and the tension that require approximately two weeks of treatment.
2. On May 21, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) and driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.206% from the 2km section from the front of the mushroom farm in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon to the front of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon to the road.
3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;
Nevertheless, the defendant operated a car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. The police of D. D.