A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) At the scam of the Defendant’s two parallels, etc., where they are heard, whether the injured person F or G is a horse F or policeman (“the governance scambling, scambling, scambling, scambling, scambling, scambling, and nick;

Dried fluor of a police fluor of a bitch

The victims were openly insulting by openly obsing them through a large sound, such as the "router".

2. Around 01:555 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) informed the Defendant of the defect that he was dispatched to the scene by a slope I, who was requested by a policeman G, etc. to support the Defendant at the same place; and (b) informed the Defendant that he could be punished as a crime of insult if I continuously desires to do so; and (c) interfere with a police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to police officer’s 112 reporting duties, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each statement of H, I, F, and G;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Articles 311 and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes. (Inter alia, the crimes of insult of each of the above crimes);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Order to Attend Education* With respect to the obstruction of the performance of official duties during the crime of this case, the sentencing guidelines are applied in cases where the degree of special mitigation factors (one month to August), special mitigation factors, assault, threat, and deceptive scheme is minor, but the above criteria are concurrent crimes with the offense of insult. Thus, the above criteria are referred only to the lowest limit.

In light of these circumstances and the criminal facts of the defendant, one of the cases is against the defendant, there is no record of punishment more severe than the fine, and the defendant's age, sex, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined by the order.