A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On March 22, 2018, at around 00:30 on March 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) parked on the way prior to “D” in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the police officer as a 112 police officer, who was a patrol officer at the police station E box of Gwangju Seo-gu, who was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports, and was able to refrain from doing so; and (c) the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s lawful performance of duties regarding the handling of reported cases.

B. On May 17, 2018, at around 02:55, the Defendant: (a) assaulted a female-friendly Gu in front of a restaurant in Seo-gu in Gwangju, Seo-gu; (b) and (c) asked I to ask I about his personal information, etc. by the police box belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station E box in Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, who was dispatched to the site upon receiving a report of 112; and (b) the Defendant asked I about his/her personal information, etc.

The police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report Report Report case by putting the I's chest into three fingers while taking a bath, such as "", and obstructing the police officer's performance of duties.

2. The Defendant’s insult No. 1. B. at the same date and time, and at the same place as the paragraph 1.2, and the victim I, the police officer, who was called out after receiving a report, listened to the victim’s question about his/her personal information, etc., where he/she heard six persons from whom he/she would be asked.

I would like to be able to find the victim to be sexually insulting, and they died, and they made the victim publicly insulting by referring to the so-called "the so-called".

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on police statements made to F, J and I;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order [the scope of punishment recommended according to sentencing guidelines] - Interference with the performance of each official duty - Interference with the performance of official duties - Basic area (flosts from June to June) (flosts from June to June) (flosts from June) - No special person subject to sentencing.