1. The Defendant’s KRW 43,837,980 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 22, 2013 to April 28, 2017.

1. On April 18, 2013, the Plaintiff received delayed re-treatment using the left-hand re-lic by the Defendant. On May 3, 2013, the Plaintiff saw the Defendant as having caused pains on the operation department, and presented only the opinion that the Defendant is doubtful, but the Defendant returned home without any particular measure.

May 6, 2013 by the Plaintiff

5. 8. Even in August, 198, the defendant was sent back to the defendant again, but the defendant also returned to home only a dynamic test.

On May 21, 2013, the Plaintiff continuously complained of the chest pain, and eventually, the Plaintiff was suspected of infections by the operation department, and was in charge of the operation to remove a substitute, and the Defendant only conducted a dynamic test and did not conduct a frisome test and a frisome test.

On May 22, 2013, the Plaintiff undergone an operation to remove sacrife at the left bank, and at that time, infection was already caused on the surgery department.

On May 26, 2013, 4 days after the surgery, around 23:59, the Plaintiff’s clock in the Plaintiff’s operating room and malodor is suspected to have been infected by the operating room. In such cases, the Defendant’s blood test or clock test has no trace of the Defendant’s clock test.

On June 5, 2013, the Plaintiff returned to the Defendant again, and the upper part was punished by the higher part of the body, and the Plaintiff implemented the spug for medical use.

On February 13, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) performed an operation by the Defendant re-injecting a re-influence into the left bank; (b) on the same day, upon the Plaintiff’s request, expanded the right bank to the right; (c) in order to increase the size of the left bank in accordance with the size of the right bank, the Plaintiff already inserted the re-influence into the left bank; and (d) inserted the volume of the re-influence from 140c to 200c.

However, another type of sptococus galactiae, saphylcocus eidis was found as a result of the equal cultivation test conducted by the Defendant on April 4, 2014.

Ultimately, on April 8, 2014, the defendant removes re-explosives on the left side of the plaintiff.