The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On August 3, 2013, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant took a dog in front of a national bank residing permanently in permanent residence and took a book in front of a national bank (the age of 18) and took a bath to himself/herself on several occasions on the ground that he/she took a part of the victim C’s face; (b) in order to prevent the occurrence of any defect by assaulting himself/herself against this, he/she took his/her hand on the part of the victim, and in order to prevent his/her escape and escape, he/she had the victim take his/her hand over his/her body, and go beyond the upper part of the floor, and caused the victim to inflict an injury on the victim, such as the victim’s 3 balance 4 weeks of raw spaw, spawd and spawd part, spawd part of the river, and spawd part of the road.

2. Determination

A. First, in full view of all the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court with respect to the part that “the defendant made several times of the victim’s face face,” the victim’s statement and D’s statement as shown in the above facts are doubtful, and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the above facts, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

With respect to the developments leading up to the occurrence of the case, the Defendant consistently testified from the investigative agency to this court that “the Defendant was able to hear the name of a woman from a new bank near the permanent branch of a bank in which he was living in pet dog and was able to do so, and then 3 men and 2 women were her ageed, but she was her old, but she went back to the national bank and went back to the national bank. At the next time, the Defendant she her will by referring to one of the above flusing neighbors and her desire, and the Defendant she also expressed that “the victim, one of the above flusing neighbors, she was her around the Da and the Defendant.”

The defendant's statements are considerably specific and consistent.