(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.29 2014노4478 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.29 2014노4478

상해

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In full view of the statements of witnesses, including the victim of the grounds for appeal, and the statements in the photo and the written diagnosis of injury of the victim taken on the day of the case, the defendant sufficiently recognizes the fact that the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, including the victim, by making the victim go beyond the victim's face several times in hand, by making the victim go beyond the victim's face, and by cutting the victim's body into the victim's upper part of the 3 hand

However, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact that the lower court acquitted the facts charged of this case, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined that, in light of the circumstances as indicated in its reasoning, based on the evidence admitted by the evidence adopted by the prosecutor, the Defendant, solely based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, inflicted injury on the victim’s face by taking the victim over several times in hand, and by taking the victim over the floor, thereby causing approximately four weeks of treatment to the right side of the 3 water surface, etc.

The charges of this case were acquitted on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

1) As to the process of the occurrence of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) consistently followed from the investigative agency to the present court about the background of the occurrence of the instant case from the Defendant to the instant court; (b) “Along with the process of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) had to the direction of a female at a new bank room near the permanent branch of the area where the Defendant was faced with pet dog; (c) 3 men and 2 women aged at that time; and (d) had to go back to the direction of the Defendant; (b) had to go back to the face of the national bank; and (c) had to go back to the face of the Korean people bank; (d) later, one of the aforementioned behaviors was referring to the Defendant who was able to take a dog and her desire to take a dog; and (e) the Defendant Da and her surrounding the Defendant.

3.2. As stated in the Disposition above, the Defendant

The defendant's statements are considerably specific and consistent.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2014.11.04 2014고정84

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.12.20 2017고정667

-대구지방법원 2016.02.05 2014노3622

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.20 2016고정781

-대전지방법원 2016.05.24 2015고단2477