Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 28, 2017, the Defendant left the house following the apartment building B, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, to the victim C (e.g., 42 years of age) (e., her) where the river site was broken down without giving a table to it, while the Defendant left the house and was taking a book of care of the flusium of the Defendant.

After all, the Defendant, by the above negligence, had the victim play beyond the scope of the victim, and examined the loss on the floor, thereby causing about five weeks of treatment to the victim, thereby causing the victim to suffer an injury to the alley of heavy water which requires approximately five weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. According to the above evidence, a medical certificate, a medical records, and a written request for cooperation in the investigation (the date and time of the judgment, and at the place of the judgment, the fact that the above pet dog, where the Defendant was her husband and her wife at the time when she was her husband and her husband and her wife was her husband and her wife at the time when she was her husband and her husband, is recognized.

Defendant did not look at the situation at the time when the above pet dog was committed against the victim, and arrived at the place where the victim was driven by the pet dog late, but it was recognized that the pet dog was destroyed by the negligence that did not properly set the pet dog, or that the pet dog was destroyed by the victim's pet dog due to the negligence that did not properly carry the pet dog, or that the pet dog was damaged by the wind (the Defendant was investigated by the prosecutor, even when he was investigated by the prosecutor, the above pet dog went to the driving of the victim by negligence that did not put the pet dog at the time of the instant case while pet dog was being carried out, and thereby, the fact that the pet dog was destroyed by the pet dog carried out by the victim is recognized.

“On the other hand, the Defendant stated to the effect that the instant facts charged, i.e., the victim’s sexual intercourse, was committed.”