logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.27 2017고단1391
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around December 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 20:20 on the victim E (the 56-year-old age) hedging with the Defendant; (b) at the “G” coffee shop located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (c) while she had a horse dispute with the victim, the Defendant frighted the knick, such as the knick B B B, with his hand, onto the wall of the victim’s defect in order for the victim to file a report; and (d) she sawd the victim with the view that “the knick, dead, and so on shall do so.” On the floor, the Defendant continued to walk away from the floor to the victim’s left head buck; and (d) continued to walk the victim’s face with the main knick and knick the victim’s left 3m in diameter of the dangerous substance 1.5m in diameter of the victim’s left c/ her face of the victim.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by putting the table in his hand at the time, time, and place mentioned in paragraph 1, and then destroying a 100 cm wide, 60 cm long, and 0.5 cm thick, which is 0.5 cm thicked in the market value, by breaking up a 50 cm wide from the floor of the glass cup accumulated in a kitchen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness H and E;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (Submission, etc. of a medical certificate of injury);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted the mental and physical disorder of the defendant and his defense counsel under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act as to the aggravated concurrent crimes. However, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted the mental and physical disorder as to the facts charged of this case, which are acknowledged by the evidence as mentioned above.

arrow