1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant is paid KRW 2,090,430,000 from the plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. Paragraph (2) is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to further determination of the defendant's assertion that the defendant was emphasized or added as the grounds for appeal by this court. Thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, including the summary thereof, is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment] The portion of the first instance court's decision is that "it was subject to a disposition of the administrative disposition plan on May 15, 2018" in the attached Forms 4 and 5 of the 3rd instance court's decision, "the administrative disposition plan was received on May 10, 2018, and the height market publicly notified the management disposition plan on May 15, 2018."

The term "litigation" (hereinafter referred to as "previous lawsuit") shall be added between "litigation" and "B" in Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, "Seoul High Court 2012 Gohap28440" is the Seoul High Court 2012Na28440.

Part 3 of the decision of the first instance court, the "decision of recommending reconciliation" in Part 10 shall be deemed to be the "decision of recommending reconciliation" (hereinafter referred to as the "previous decision of recommending reconciliation").

Part 18 and 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows.

[2] A building listed in [Attachment 1] List 2 (hereinafter “instant building”).

A) The lease agreement as indicated in the attached Table 2 lease agreement (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”).

(ii)The lease deposit stipulated in each of the above lease agreements will be the sum of KRW 145,00,000.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.

[Ground for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 14, 24 (if any number is available, each number shall be included).

hereinafter the same shall apply.

(2) If the market price of the first instance court’s appraiser E is entrusted with the appraisal of the market price of the first instance court’s appraisal, the market price of the first instance court’s appraiser E is entrusted with the appraisal of the market price of the first instance court’s appraisal.