1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On July 4, 2017, the basic facts consisting of illegal parking in Daegu-si B and C, Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-si, around 19:46

A. On July 5, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with respect to illegal parking vehicles via a national newspaper website (www.epeople.go.r) as follows.

1. He shall have a deep interest in the ordinary Gu administration and to audit the thickness of the newborn baby by sending it.

2. It shall be noted that a candidate is guilty of causing inconvenience to traffic due to illegal parking vehicles with a thickness.

3. The Gu office shall inform that the illegal parking vehicle is scheduled to take measures in accordance with the relevant provisions, and shall strengthen the guidance and control of illegal parking and stopping for the relevant section.

4. Although smartphones, which are processed by citizen's information, are institutionalized to impose a fine for negligence on the app from the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs in accordance with the corresponding machine new, the national newspaper sending a thickness is not such manual, nor can it impose a fine for negligence because there is no manual corresponding to it in the form of petition or recommendation.

5. In making a future report, on the face of sending a app with a smartphone, it shall be difficult to faithfully inform the answer picture.

I shall audit and inspect.

B. On July 21, 2017, the Defendant responded to the Plaintiff as follows:

(hereinafter “instant reply”). 【The grounds for recognition】 Evidence Nos. 3, 1 through 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The plaintiff, ex officio, asserts that it is difficult for the plaintiff to report even through the citizen newspaper to eradicate illegal parking, and that the defendant's answer of this case is unfair and thus should be revoked.

An administrative agency's refusal to take action in response to the application against the affirmative action of the people living together shall be subject to appeal litigation.