Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for two years and six months, respectively.

From the Defendants, each of them was 3,779.

Punishment of the crime

1. Although the Defendants’ co-principals did not act as a person handling narcotics, they had the intent to smuggling and sell the psychotropic drugs from China (i.e., one-name clopon; hereinafter “copon”), and Defendant A had the intent to purchase copon through “H” in China and deliver the mobile phone devices usable in China to Defendant B, and Defendant B had the intention to directly bring the copon into China as agreed upon with Defendant A.

Defendant

B Pursuant to the above plan, around May 30, 2014, the Republic of China Jink-ro of the same year

5.31. At around 31. The same year after being delivered approximately 100 g of philophones from the seller of philophones at the Sulphe Island in China, hiding them at the bottom of the new launch:

6. 2. Around 15:15, a Dog-phone was pushed down to the Republic of Korea by entering a passenger ship of XIN YU JIN XG via an international passenger terminal located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to import psychotropic drugs-related phiphones.

2. Although Defendant A’s sole criminal administration is not a person handling narcotics, Defendant A’s sole criminal administration

(a)on August 21, 2014 through 22. 16:00, approximately 0.03g of philophones are administered in the manner of crypting beer at the main points of the trade name in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Guro-gu, in the manner of crypting to beer;

B. On August 27, 2014, around 16:03, around 2016:03, approximately 0.01g of oponphones around the J Hospital located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I stored them in the way of keeping them in the wallet, in a way of wrapping paper, at least 0.01g of oponphones in front of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness A, B, L and M;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the Defendants (including the questioning part, but excluding each prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the Defendants A against the Defendants who denies the actual authenticity (the third prosecutor's protocol is the only part of the Defendant's statement))

1. Each Prosecution with respect to M and L.