A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the road "D convenience points" located in North-Gu C at Port-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si around 21:45.

Therefore, as the security guards F, who were dispatched to the above place after having received a report that the hosts are playing on the road, and the security guards, such as the security guards F, who were the police officers belonging to the Pohang Police Station Espons, were sponsed for returning home, the Defendant, who was said to have committed the assault, such as taking a bath and verbal abuse, such as the openings, spacks, spacks, spons, and sponsing the f and the above G, and sponsing the f and the above G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives, bodies, and property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2003Do320, Jan.