logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2017.08.22 2017고단363
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The facts charged of the instant case (Article 13 of the Inventory 2017 resident stay support at the Daegu District Court; Article 2006 High Court resident stay support at the Daegu District Court 2607 High Court 2007 High Court 206 High Court 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of March 21, 2008) (wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of March 21, 2008), the relevant Constitutional Court 2008Hun-Ga decided July 30, 2009, and Article 86 of the above Act, where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation provided for in Article 83 (1) 3 of the Act with respect to the business of the corporation, shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article.

“The portion of the above facts charged is unconstitutional and thus the penal provision on the above facts charged becomes retroactively null and void. It is not guilty in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act as it does not constitute a crime.

arrow