logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2017.08.22 2017고단362
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The facts charged of the instant case (Article 12 of the Inventory of 2017 resident stay support at the Daegu District Court; Article 2006 High Court resident stay support at the Daegu District Court 1742 of the High Court 1742 of the High Court 2006) shall be subject to a fine under Article 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) (wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) of the relevant Constitutional Court 208Hun-Ga decided July 30, 2009 and Article 86 of the same Act, where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 3 of the Act with respect to the business of the corporation, the relevant corporation shall also be subject to a fine under Article 83 (1) 3 of the same Act.

“The portion of the above facts charged is unconstitutional and thus the penal provision on the above facts charged becomes retroactively null and void. It is not guilty in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act as it does not constitute a crime.

arrow