logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.01.28 2015고단1240
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspension of execution, and was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business in the Suwon District Court Pyeongtaek District Court on September 12, 2013 during the suspension period, and on March 12, 2014, the said suspension of execution was revoked upon the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 12, 2014, and the execution of said sentence was completed in the said prison on July 18, 2014.

I. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40 on May 14, 2015, the Defendant 1240 of the 2015 Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the 2015 Republic of Korea”). (b) around 22:40 on May 14, 2015, the Victim E, an employee of the said convenience store, demanded the Defendant to account the Defendant.

“Absing the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance within the convenience store and obstructing the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as threatening the victim in a manner in which the victim seems to have been on the part of the victim by putting him/her at the convenience store and having him/her visit the convenience store.

Ⅱ. The Defendant, “Isle 2015 Highest 2178,” on October 3, 2015, on the ground that Isle Ham Ham Ham Ham Hanyang-si, Mayang-si, F on October 3, 2015, the Defendant did not inform the Victim H (19 years old), an employee of the said convenience store of the address properly, under the influence of alcohol;

C. The author expressed that he will be able to see the victim’s request, and continuously expressed the victim’s great voice without disregarding the victim’s request, thereby making the customer out of the convenience store and preventing the customer from being out of the convenience store and entering the convenience store, thereby hindering the victim’s legitimate convenience store business for a period of up to one hour.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A H statement;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: an inquiry about criminal history;

arrow