A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a reason of obstructing the performance of official duties, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2016.

On September 17, 2017, from around 2:40 to around 3:28 of the same day, the Defendant entered the D convenience store located in Gwangju-gu Dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, and brought assault to high school students. The Defendant, an employee, who is no superior, e.g., the victim E (n., 21 years of age), bling time to the victim E (n.e., the aged 21 years of age) who is an employee, and repeatedly repeated to other unspecified customers, who enter the convenience store by putting a large amount of talking to the other unspecified customers, and again repeated the Defendant’s cell phone report that was lost before it was demanded by the said victim, and subsequently refused to request the said victim to report the cell phone that was lost before it.

Since then, the Defendant sought a convenience store again on the same day at around 6:38, and there is an assault against the said victim and the said victim F (the age of 28) who is an employee of the Defendant “I would be able to suppress, how it would be, before doing so, three women who were in front of the tin church;

10 The head of the 10th Burg, the police driver's flab

The purpose of this paper is to see that other female customers see themselves, and, on the ground of the fact that other women sees themselves, they expressed a bath, and drink drinking prior to the entrance of convenience stores, and to see unspecified customers using this place, and to see that customers who enter convenience stores by referring to “as soon as possible in this flab fe” to the large interest of “as soon as flab fe”, and thereby interfere with the duties of convenience stores until 09:58 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the convenience store work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement made by the victims;

1. On-site photographs, CCTV images of the D convenience store, and CDs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes written inquiry, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;