A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of five hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power” On December 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on December 2, 2015, and was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business, etc. at the same court on April 13, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 21, 2017, and the sentence of the said suspended sentence was invalidated, and the execution of the said sentence was completed on June 10, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Interference with business;

A. On October 15, 2018, from around 14:27 to 16:31 of the same day, the Defendant expressed the victim’s “scam” at the convenience store in the operation of the victim C, which is located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and expressed the victim’s “scambling,” and made it impossible for the said customer to utilize the convenience store in a normal manner by avoiding disturbance, such as paying the time fee to the customers who want to use

B. On October 15, 2018, from around 17:57 to 19:15 of the same day, the Defendant expressed the following convenience points: (a) from around 17:57 on October 15, 2018 to 19:15 on the same day, the Defendant expressed the victim D, an employee under the influence of alcohol, “unsatisfying”; and (b) made it impossible for the said customers to use the usual convenience store by avoiding disturbance,

C. On October 15, 2018, from around 19:40 to 23:00 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed at the convenience store as above; (b) expressed the victim E, an employee under the influence of alcohol, that “the same year as pigs” was “the same; and (c) made it impossible for the said customer to utilize the said convenience store in a normal manner by avoiding disturbance, such as paying time fees, etc. to the customers who want to use the convenience store.

On October 15, 2018, from around 23:00 to October 16, 2018, the Defendant expressed a desire to the effect that the said convenience store is “influence without a container” to the victim F, an employee under the influence of alcohol, and that the said customer could not use the normal convenience store by avoiding disturbance, such as paying a trial fee, etc., to the customers who intend to use the convenience store.

Accordingly, the defendant is forced to work for the convenience store business of victims.