logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.08.08 2017가단84316
토지인도
Text

1. Of the 2,300 square meters in Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, the Defendant indicated in the attached Form 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 15, respectively, on the part of the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. D on June 17, 1965, completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the land of 2,300 square meters prior to Soyang-gu, Seoyang-gu (hereinafter “instant land”) on January 5, 1959. The Plaintiff, who is a child of D, completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the said land on October 23, 2004 due to inheritance by agreement division on October 2, 2004.

B. Around October 8, 1986, E leased part of the instant land from F, the Plaintiff’s father in around 1960, and newly constructed a wooden string ground 74.38 square meters on that part of the instant land, thereby completing registration of ownership preservation.

C. On October 13, 1986, G, the husband of the defendant, purchased the above single-story house from E with 2.5 million won, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the 15th of the same month.

The lot number of single-story housing was C in Gyeyang-gu, Goyangyang-gu, and the register was closed due to the loss on August 31, 2016.

Then, G extended the above single-story housing to 111 square meters in a ship which connects the above single-story housing with the Defendant in sequence with the items indicated in the annexed drawing Nos. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20, and 15, and newly constructed 33 square meters in a warehouse for “c” portion of the annexed drawing Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24, and 21 in sequence with the annexed drawing Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24, and 21 (hereinafter “instant building”), which connects the above multi-story housing with the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant housing site”), and paid to D the Plaintiff a difference.

G dead after June 2006, the Defendant succeeded to the instant building and continued to live there, and paid the Plaintiff the rent of the instant housing site as the Plaintiff, and finally paid KRW 600,000,000 from the beginning of 2017 to the beginning of 2017.

The lease contract for the instant housing site that was succeeded to the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) is to be terminated by both parties.

arrow