Defendants are innocent.

1. Defendant A, at around 15:08 on August 24, 2010, is a non-humanist who works in G hospital, and around 15:08, the victim H was a doctor who was a doctor who was a major in the foregoing hospital and was a doctor who had been a major in the first year training at the above hospital at around August 2010.

The Schedule is an ample-, ample-, or ample-, in order to reduce pains made by using merotorawls with the ingredients of other persons, so that it shall not be administered to patients with an engine tent or its power, or to patients with a stoves or any other non-stoves stoves control, who have a stoves reaction with stoves, stoves, or Alphine stoves, and in the event that stoves are used by stoves, it shall not be administered to patients with serious stoves, such as stoves, and so it shall not be administered to stoves, so that the stoves patients with serious stoves, such as stoves, may be stoves, and therefore, it shall not be administered to stoves.

On the other hand, the Defendants, who are doctors of treating the patients, have the duty of care to administer appropriate drugs by checking in advance the patient's medical history and the side effects of the drugs that may occur to the patient. Defendant A, as a medical specialist, has a duty of care to explain in detail the patient's medical history and state, and the side effects of the drugs that may occur to the patient, and to guide and supervise the patient.

Defendant

A, prior to the operation of the victim, there is a fluorous diagnosis of the victim that the victim was in a astronomical organ together with fluoral salt and fluoral mar, and there is little sense that the victim suffered the fluoral organ from the victim and the victim was suffering from the fluoral organ and there is a fluoral reaction to the ice, and other medical professionals of the above hospital have a fluoral organ for the victim.

As a result of diagnosis, the victim is a patient who has a tent for the engine and has a sensitive reaction.