logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.13 2015누33372
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance does not differ from the content of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, and even if examining the respective descriptions of evidence No. 16 through No. 25 submitted in the trial, the first instance court’s determination rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable (this court also claims that the Plaintiff’s name “explosive pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary ect.” However, in light of the Plaintiff’s statement No. 21 and the overall purport of the pleading’s argument’s fact-finding as to the head of the Seoul Hospital at the time of the instant court’s net mal mal bomic fE1’s response (FE1’s concealment in full, fE1’s engine volume) that first occurred to the patient of the engine.

Although these 200ml or more and 12% increase) appear, since they do not seem to have a training reaction whenever conducting a test, if they show a training reaction at one time, they would eventually be "training". However, on April 6, 2007, the Plaintiff appears to have a training reaction (i.e., an increase of 240ml or 21% from 12ml to 36ml or 21% as the FE1 increased from 12m to 1.36ml or 21%) in the training reaction at the central university hospital's engine expansion test on April 6, 2007. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's argument cannot be accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for this case is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow