1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. As to the instant case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance, the reasoning of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following matters are brought respectively among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence

The part of the 7th through 5th, “The degree of damage and the defendant’s liability ratio shall be determined 30:70,000 won as the insurer of A, taking into account various circumstances, such as the degree of damage, especially the amount of damage caused by the deceased and their bereaved family members, and the rate of liability for the plaintiff and the defendant, who are the insurer of A, shall be determined at 40:60,000, 73,919,014 won per annum from the day after the day when the plaintiff paid the plaintiff’s liability to the plaintiff to the day when the plaintiff performed his liability (i.e., the rate of liability for damages incurred by the deceased and their bereaved family members is determined at 40:6:80,00 won, 120,000 won - 73,919,014 won per annum from the day after the day when the plaintiff performed his liability to the day when the damages incurred by the traffic accident occurred x 184,7536% per annum and 20% per annum from the defendant’s.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit, and the part against the defendant who ordered payment exceeding the above recognition amount among the judgment of the court of first instance which partially different conclusions is unfair.