1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the court of first instance, which cited the part of the third party 4 in the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed “the plaintiff” of the fifth party 1, 4, and 5 as “the victim,” respectively, and that of the fifth party 1, 4, and 5 as “the victim,” respectively, and that of the third party 7 in the judgment of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the part below “the judgment on the defendants’ assertion” (hereinafter “the judgment on the defendants’ assertion”), and therefore,

[Supplementary Use]

C. Determination of the Defendants’ assertion 1) In calculating the scope of the Defendants’ assertion (A) right to indemnity, the ratio of liability of the Defendants B should be recognized as 30%.

B) In Gwangju District Court 2015Kadan1546 (U.S.), where the respondent filed a claim for the instant accident against the Gwangju District Court 2015Kadan1546 (U.S.), the respondent succeeding to the Plaintiff filed a claim for KRW 16,425,420 in total, including disability pension 4,345,440, and disability pension 12,079,980, which were paid from April 1, 2015 to March 3, 2017, and the National Pension Service rendered a favorable judgment at the first instance judgment. Accordingly, according to the Plaintiff’s previous judgment in the instant case, the Plaintiff’s prize money and the National Pension Service’s indemnity conflict with each other, Defendant Samsung Fire 2, which is an insurance company of the tea, is liable to pay only the adjusted amount. 2,000,000,0000 won, which were determined to be liable for reimbursement rate of KRW 16,425,420,000.