logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.05 2016나69279
사해행위 취소 등
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The real estate indicated in the separate sheet between the defendant and the network E.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of each of the following parts by reflecting the results of market price appraisal of the area of 3,603 square meters before H at the time of the door-to-door of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (the judgment on the claim for revocation

Following the 6th 18th 13th 7th 3th 7th 7th 13th 8th 13th “the result of the market price appraisal by the AppellateJ” to add each “15,492,90 won” to “15,492,90 won”, each “931,224,752 won” of the 7th 5th 8th 15th 19 and 9th 11th 11th “943,892,90 won”, each “253,24,752 won” of the 9th 9th 265,892,90 20th 265,892,90 10th 10th 10th 26,612,376th 10th 10th 10th 36,56136th 16,5360,5360”, each “the 50th 506th 136,50

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim that was reduced to the trial for the first time is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as above and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow