1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part as to the defendant Calinum Co., Ltd. concerning the defendant Calinum shall be modified as follows:

C.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows, and the reasons for the court's explanation of this case are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the partial dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

(However, the part concerning Codefendant A in the first instance trial is excluded from the part concerning Codefendant A), 2. 7. 2. 7. 2. to 13. 7. 13.

[A] Comprehensively taking account of the fact-finding results and the overall purport of arguments by the court of first instance as to whether each of the evidence revealed above the non-party company’s debt exceeded 30,285,832 won at the time of the second disposition, the non-party company’s debt amounting to KRW 974,795,880 at the market price as of October 5, 2015 was limited to the real estate of this case. On the other hand, the non-party company’s debt amounting to KRW 1,404,937,729 at the Daegu Bank; KRW 4,187,720 at the time of the non-party company’s non-party company’s non-party company’s non-party company’s non-party company’s non-party company’s non-party company’s non-party debt amounting to KRW 70,700,000,000 at the Industrial Bank of Korea; KRW 121,362,2815

'The 16th to 19th of the first instance court ruling's 16th to the same 19th of the judgment shall be followed as follows. 3) The 2th disposition must be revoked by fraudulent act.

On the other hand, it is inappropriate for the court in charge of a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution to set the specific amount of dividend in its judgment.