logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.20 2017나33581
사해행위취소
Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The quoted trial of the first instance court was examined closely by the parties’ allegations and the evidence presented at the first instance court and the first instance court, but it does not seem that there was any error in the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On No. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "the registration of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the instant neighboring mortgage" was completed by the "the registration of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the neighboring mortgage pursuant to the instant mortgage contract".

The 5th page 3 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be applied at the latest.

The 7th of the 7th of the first instance judgment "70,000,000 won" has been added to "71,000,000 won" (=23,000,000 won).

Part 7 of the Decision of the first instance court, "35,00,000 won" shall be 336,000,000 won.

On the 7th 14th 15th 15th 15th 7th 15th 7th 15th 15th 7th 15th 7th 7th 15th 7th 7th 14th 148th 148th 00,000 won of the instant real estate, “In addition to the possession of the instant real estate equivalent to 148,000,000 won of the instant real estate as active property (the Defendant did not accept the Defendant’s assertion as to whether the instant real estate’s market value was 280,000,000 won at the time of the instant real estate. However, even if the market value of the instant real estate was 280,000,000 won at the time of the instant judgment, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to whether the instant real estate exceeded obligations and its recognition was accepted).”

From 8th to 9th 7th 10th 7th 14th 10th 200.

In full view of the contents of evidence No. 7-12, evidence No. 7-12, and evidence No. 1, among the non-party companies, the whole purport of the pleadings is examined.

arrow