Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, each of the above defendants is against the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 9, 2012, Defendant A, a co-principal of the Defendants, on leased No. 104 and No. 2615 of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building No. 104 and 1.1.15, posted a job offer advertisement stating that “the high profit security and the hourly page is high,” on the Internet domina website, and employed the said advertisement as female employees, and advertised “F” on the Internet amusement forum website. Defendant B conspired to arrange commercial sex acts by guiding an officetel where female employees receive money in return for sexual intercourse from customers who reported commercial sex acts on the Internet website.

The Defendants conspired as above on October 30, 2012, and received 270,000 won in return for sexual intercourse from the guest G G who reported the Internet site commercial sex acts, and provided guidance as 104,2615,000 won to female employees E to have sexual intercourse. In return, the Defendants engaged in the commercial sex acts by providing guidance as 104,2615,000 won among the above 270,000 won, to female employees.

2. On October 12, 2012, from around October 18, 2012 to around the same month, Defendant A provided a shower room, etc. with the D building 104 Dong 5.10,000,000 won per month, and posted a commercial sex act advertisement on the Internet website “H”, and then employed female employees I, and had them receive KRW 120,000 won per hour in return for sexual intercourse from males, and let female employees do sexual intercourse by guiding them to an officetel with female employees in return for sexual intercourse, and accordingly, Defendant A operated a commercial sex arrangement business by paying KRW 90,000,000 out of the above 120,000,000 to female employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect examination of each police officer against J, I, G, and E;

1. Application of each seizure protocol, internal photographs of officetels and regulations-related photographs;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;