logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.02.10 2016고단5291
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the time of operating a commercial sex business establishment with the trade name of "C" in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 102 and 420, the Defendant agreed in advance with female employees to distribute KRW 100,000 to KRW 150,000 per week, KRW 50,000 for female employees, KRW 220,000 for female employees, KRW 70,000 for female employees, KRW 150,000 for female employees, KRW 300,000 for female employees, KRW 300,000 for female employees, and KRW 20,000 for female employees, and agreed in advance with them to find out commercial sex acts by telephone.

On August 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) informed the male son G that was found in the said “C” sexual traffic business establishment as an officetel; (b) sent the female employee H into the said officetel to G to have sexual intercourse with H; and (c) from July 4, 2016 to August 1, 2016, the Defendant obtained profits of KRW 2,400,000 per day by having male guests and female employees do sexual intercourse with the said “C” within the said “C” sexual traffic business establishment, and by punishing the average of KRW 120,000 per day.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

On September 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) rented 604 Itel 604 in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu around September 12, 2016, and (b) operated a commercial sex dealing business establishment, “K” from the end of the end of September 2016, when operating a commercial sex dealing business establishment, the Defendant agreed to pay 110,000 won to female employees in advance when receiving 1.60,000 won from the south of sex purchase; (b) by raising advertisements to the Internet sex dealing business site, such as “D”, “F, etc., which is an Internet sex dealing business site,” and (c) attempted to arrange sex trafficking by having male customers and the said female employees engage in sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant on October 6, 2016, at around 02:30, the above Itel No. 604.

arrow