1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On November 18, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, and 4 million won of fine at the Seoul Northern District Court on the charge of violation of the Act on the Law of Defense, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 20, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

A. On June 2013, the Defendant violated the law of defense at bar bar in which the trade name in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1 A is unknown, and the Defendant underwent a regular inspection of the building at the competent fire station on the 7th floor floor building in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, the ownership of which is Seongbuk-gu, and the fire station should restore the part where “the illegal extension is being made” from the fire station.

If it is not restored to the original state, it shall be notified to the Seongbuk-gu Office.

“As the speech was heard, it was requested by the competent fire station, public officials in charge of the Seongbuk-gu office, etc. to resolve it well so as not to receive an order for restoration from the original state upon receiving a fine for illegal buildings only.”

Accordingly, the defendant is hotly likely to be resolved well because there are many people in the fire station and the Gu office.

“Around that time, a cash amount of KRW 20 million was granted from the injured party under the pretext of teaching expenses, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by public officials.

B. From September 5, 2011 to September 4, 2015, the Defendant took overall charge of the following duties: (a) a person who served as the head of Seoul H’s headquarters; and (b) personnel and organizational management of H.

On December 14, 2012, the Defendant received a request from Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I to “K divided into K within the Corporation and make one team leader form” from B, and received KRW 5 million in cash under the pretext of the honorarium.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.

2. Defendant B’s solicitation as above to A at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph 1-b, and granted KRW 5 million in cash under the pretext of such solicitation, and received a bribe in relation to public officials’ duties.