The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the facts charged in this case can be fully recognized, and the judgment of the court below which acquitted the charged facts in this case is erroneous in misconception of facts.

2. Around 19:00 on June 17, 201, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant introduced and arranged a job in order to engage in selling sex by harming the purchase of the flight ticket so that he/she can engage in sexual traffic in F, which is a commercial sex business establishment located in the east of Japan, within 1305, of the building C, Busan, Daegu, Busan, and Da, a commercial sex business establishment located in the east of Japan; and (b) the Defendant may fully pay off all the damages if he/she goes to F, which is located in the east of Japan.

3. In light of the fact that the court below stated that D stated in the court below's court that "the defendant was solicited to work at a Japanese sexual traffic business establishment, not the defendant, and only the defendant had a fact corresponding to the public port," and G stated that "the defendant was informed of the phone number of the Japanese sexual traffic business establishment, the flight aircraft table was sought from the sexual traffic business establishment, and the defendant was merely a sexual traffic business establishment to the public port," the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged in this case and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them. Thus, there is no error of law by mistake of facts, such as the prosecutor's assertion.

4. Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.