1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from March 26, 2013 to November 23, 2017.

Basic Facts

On July 12, 2012, the Plaintiff concluded the following construction contracts (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction contract”) with the Defendant with respect to the new construction of multi-family house C in Yeongi-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “instant construction”) with the construction cost of KRW 432 million and the construction period from July 16, 2012 to December 16, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction contract”).

8. Where the date of scheduled completion is delayed due to the plaintiff's intention or negligence, he/she shall reimburse rental proceeds.

(Provided, That this shall not apply to inevitable cases caused by natural disasters, natural disasters, and administrative parts).

6. Method of paying construction cost: The Plaintiff completed the construction cost of KRW 42,00,000 for the primary payment period (the owner shall pay the construction cost to the contractor at the time specified below) and the primary payment period of KRW 50,000,000 for advance payment (contract amount) up to 190,000,000 for the primary second floor concrete removal from the primary floor, and completed the construction work of KRW 70,000 for the third external main work within 82,00,000 for the third external main work after the completion of the construction work of KRW 242,00,000 for the third external main work within one month after the completion of the construction work of KRW 42,00,000 for the remainder of KRW 82,00 for the primary work of KRW 80,000 and KRW 400 for the primary work of KRW 30,301,200; and

The details of the construction cost paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff under the instant construction contract are as follows.

The amount of payment (won) 1 on July 16, 2012 50,000,000 on July 16, 2012 2. 70,000,000 on August 4, 2012 3, 2012 .70,000,000 on September 24, 2012; 82,000,000 on October 22, 2012 ; 82,00,000 on October 22, 200 on June 20, 2012; 300,000,007,0007 40,000,0009,000,0000, 400,000,000,000,000, 300,000,000,00,000 for damages for delay payment; - The Defendant does not have any special reason for the Plaintiff’s allegation 301 or 304.

The defendant's assertion is relevant.