logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고정326
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a worker in daily employment.

1. On May 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00 on May 25, 2012, at the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D (V, 62 years of age) in the C Terminal B, the Defendant had to calculate the drinking value; (b) the Defendant entered the said restaurant and divided the two lines of ship, which were working days, into the said restaurant, and divided into five bbbebbbbes (5 disease).

The Defendant continued to engage in a restaurant with two drinking parties and two drinking parties who were under the influence of alcohol. However, from around 200 to around 20:40 on the day, the Defendant continued to engage in the business of the victim’s restaurant because, while coming to a dispute with two drinking customers, the Defendant, while coming to the said restaurant, she gets off the cafeterias on the floor of his/her table and her opening the cafeterias on the floor.

2. On May 25, 2012, around 18:00 on May 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had shown the same attitude that the Defendant would pay the victim food in spite of the victim’s intent or ability to pay the price even if the Defendant 2 Hobbbes were to live together with 3:00 as seen above from the victim D; (b) had been provided with food equivalent to KRW 63,00,000, and did not pay the price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by restaurants;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow