(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.05.22 2013고정1180

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.05.22 2013고정1180

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2013, at around 02:10 on February 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) requested the payment of the drinking value from the Victim E (Inn, 54 years of age) who is the owner of the business in Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) released the Defendant’s clothes once by hand from the arms of the victim, who was attached the Defendant’s clothes; (c) went out of the above restaurant door, and went out of the floor, and went out of the floor, caused the victim’s injury, such as catitis, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by witnesses E in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Ethical certificate of injury;

1. Application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes in field video CDs (Evidence Nos. 7);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. On February 21, 2013, the Defendant, among the facts charged in the instant case, entered the “Dcafeteria” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with two and the two other parties, and acquired the Defendant by deception by being provided the victim E with a total of KRW 63,00,00,00, such as cattle, beer, and beer, who is believed to be genuinely aware of the fact, although there is no intention or ability to pay the drinking value, etc.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the record of judgment are relatively consistent to the purport that: (a) the Defendant, from the investigative agency to the date of this court, had been drinking in a place where he had been drinking prior to the said restaurant; and (b) the witness G made a statement from this court to the purport that he would have been able to calculate the drinking value of KRW 300,000,000,000 in the immediately preceding drinking place; (c) however, according to the witness F’s statement, G would go to the effect that he would go through the said place when he would be able to calculate the said place; (d) however, according to the witness F’s statement, G would go through the said place by having one other than G and 1 drinking together with the Defendant.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.24 2015고단1965

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.01.31 2012고단6409

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.09.25 2013고정279

-서울북부지방법원 2012.10.24 2012고단1503

-의정부지방법원 2015.01.15 2014고단4143