beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 16, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) in the Daegu High Court on September 16, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 13,
The defendant was the representative director of D Co., Ltd. (Co., Ltd. before the change of Oct. 2, 2008) located in Gyeongbuk from Dec. 2, 2005 to Oct. 2009. Around May 2008, the above company had already suffered serious financial difficulties, and even around Feb. 2009, the retired worker did not have the ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the victims because he had reached the warning that he could not pay wages to retired workers.
1. On April 15, 2009, the Defendant: (a) introduced the victim through I, who was accompanied by the Hlaund in the operation of the Victim F (F) located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul (FF) on the early April 2009, the Defendant: (b) concealed the above circumstances; (c) obtained money from the victim under the name of investment money from the victim; and (d) made the victim a pipe new product and supplied it to the Public Procurement Service; (c) attempt to make D as a listed company. When making D into a listed company, the Defendant is going to invite investors as of the time when 3.5 billion cost is required; (d) the victim is listed after 2-3 months; and (d) the victim acquired money with the shares if listed; and (e) acquired the money by transfer from the victim after 20,000 won via the account in the name of Do on April 15, 2009.
2. On April 29, 2009, the Defendant called the victim J (Nam and 49 years of age) who was aware of his/her reputation in the Buddhist area in Seoul and does not have the intent or ability to employ his/her father as a teacher, who was prepared for the appointment of a teacher, as a middle and high school teacher, the Defendant is running as if he/she would allow his/her father/son/child to be employed as a middle and high school teacher, and the Defendant is well aware of the educational members, etc. of the office of education in South and North Korea.
When she comes to this relation, it shall be.