logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.04.29 2016고단338
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2008, the criminal defendant against the victim C in the E hotel coffee shop located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, around September 18, 2008, the defendant would be required to employ the victim C as a means to supplement the vacant space because the defendant's trial of dismissal of the former school assistant in his/her office in the Yong-nam Industrial High School is pending in the course of the trial for the appointment of a teacher to be a teacher.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to employ his/her father/child as a regular teacher of the Yong-Nam Industrial High School.

On October 22, 2008, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 70 million won from the injured party in the above E hotel coffee store as a consideration for the recruitment of regular teachers.

2. On November 2008, the Defendant against the victim F would employ the victim F as a full-time employee at the E hotel coffee shop located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as a fixed-term teacher until June 2009.

In order to be employed as a regular teacher, money is necessary.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to employ the victims as regular teachers of the Yong-Nam Industrial High School.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received 20 million won in the above E hotel coffee shop around December 8, 2008, 30 million won in the same place as around December 12, 2008, and 10 million won in the same place around January 5, 2009, respectively, from the victims, in return for the recruitment of regular teachers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or H;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, G, and I;

1. A copy of a confirmation, a statement of account transactions, a confirmation statement, a certificate of deposit transactions, a receipt, and a period of year 2009.

arrow