1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 14, 2012, 2012, the parties concerned Plaintiff A received spinal dyecology correction surgery at Korea University’s affiliated hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), Plaintiff B, and C, Plaintiff A’s parents, Plaintiff D’s form, and Plaintiff E’s form of money.

B. Plaintiff A, who was born from verteburology diagnosis and vertebrate correction surgery, was named below the right side from the birth, and was in alutrony. However, around 13 months after the birth, Plaintiff A’s disease, which was combined with at least two astronomical congenitals in the Defendant hospital, a kind of astronomical chronfel- file chronological chronology, which is a kind of astronomical chronology, with a short chronological chronological chronology, with a short table, and is also combined with congenital chronological cronology.

The diagnosis of the Klipel-Fetil Sydrome was diagnosed, and the operation was conducted after a more larger size.

Accordingly, on December 14, 2012, the Defendant hospital removed the bones of the 7th parallel shape, inserted bar, and received vertecule therapy (hereinafter “the first operation”) that transplants the barth in the left side of the flac.

C. After the instant surgery, Plaintiff A complained of the high tensions exceeding 38 degrees, the surgery division, and both arms, and continuously discharged a large amount of excreta from the surgery division. The Defendant hospital’s medical personnel confirmed that the brain amount was leaked between 6 times in diameter and 1 time in scarcitys, and subsequently, on December 21, 2012, the Defendant hospital’s medical personnel performed a warning operation using the contact system (hereinafter “second surgery”) on December 29, 2012, and subsequently, on December 29, 2012, the Defendant hospital medical personnel performed a surgery to remove a large amount of excreta inserted at the time of the second surgery (hereinafter “third surgery”).

On January 4, 2013, the plaintiff A, who was discharged from the defendant hospital and thereafter thereafter, had the symptoms of dubling, high heat, parassis, parassis, and knife, even after discharge from the defendant hospital.