1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

The relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, Plaintiff A was a person who was in the H hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant medical corporation E (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”), and was in charge of fladic verteculic vertebrates and hydronuclear removal (hereinafter “instant surgery”). Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A.

The defendant foundation is the operating entity of the defendant hospital, and the defendant F is the representative director of the defendant hospital, and the defendant G is the director who has been engaged in the surgery of this case as the dental surgery specialist belonging to the defendant hospital.

On July 7, 2012, on the ground that the process of the instant surgery and the progress after the surgery, Plaintiff A applied for the establishment of the Defendant Hospital on July 7, 2012, on the left side of the instant surgery, on the grounds of intermittent paralysis, pain, and inconvenience in walking due thereto, etc., and the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, including Defendant G conducted the MRI inspection against Plaintiff A.

On July 9, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, including Defendant G, diagnosed Plaintiff A’s symptoms with the escape certificate of a conical signboard between 5 to 1, 2012, and performed the instant surgery against Plaintiff A on the same day. Plaintiff A discharged the Defendant Hospital on July 10, 2012, following the instant surgery.

Plaintiff

On July 16, 2012, A applied to the Defendant Hospital at the time of appeal for the pain, Orsa, and the pain of the operation, and the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital, including the Defendant G, confirmed as a result of the blood examination conducted by the Plaintiff for the Plaintiff that the CRP value 6.62mg/dl (the normal range 0.30mg/dl; hereinafter the normal range ) increased to the 6.62mg/dl (the normal range 0.30mg/dl). On July 23, 2012, A hospitalized the Plaintiff, and confirmed the Plaintiff’s infection through the results of the froterbacter clocae on the part of the surgery.

Plaintiff

A discharged the Defendant Hospital on August 7, 2012, and applied to the emergency room of the Alweon Seoul National University (U.S.). The medical team of the hospital was diagnosed with the finite vertebrate No. 5-T. 1, 2012 for the Plaintiff.