beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The Plaintiffs are the parents of the deceased C (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), who are the deceased’s successors. The Defendants are the insurers who concluded an insurance contract (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant insurance contracts”) with the contents indicated below as the insured.
Defendant K non-life insurance Co., Ltd., Defendant Handong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Defendant Handong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Defendant Handong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Defendant Handong Fire Insurance Ltd., Ltd., the National Federation of Korea Green Insurance Federation of Korea Green Insurance Federation, Green Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., is liable to pay insurance proceeds under the condition of free exemption from insurance contracts with the insurance coverage period of 25,000,000 275,000,000 collective accident insurance for group accident insurance organizations, non-payment group accident insurance (won) No. 1404, Sep. 11, 2016 to 2016 to 200,000,000 insurance proceeds of 30,0000,000 insurance proceeds of 20,000 or more, and where the insured intentionally damaged the grounds for exemption from insurance contracts with its own decision-making on Sept. 1, 2016 to 2017.
On March 11, 2016, the Deceased who worked for the Army Major was killed in the course of transmission to the National Army Water Service Hospital around 11:32 on the same day, by launching the K-2 small gun he had in his possession on his own at his own mouth, and then was killed in the course of transmission to the National Army Water Service Hospital on the same day.
The deceased’s property inheritor is his parent.
[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and a summary of the argument of the whole purport of the argument by the plaintiffs is that the executives are in the process of performing the guard duty in the poor environment.