1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. On July 11, 2017, the Defendant’s salary reduction for the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff served as the First Class B commander at the Army Team B. The Army Team B.

B. On July 11, 2017, the Joint and Several Disciplinary Committee (hereinafter “instant Disciplinary Committee”) decided to take a one-month disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff for the following reasons. Accordingly, on July 11, 2017, the Defendant issued a disciplinary measure for one-month salary reduction (hereinafter “instant measure”) against the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 56 of the Military Personnel Management Act.

On the other hand, the disciplinary committee of this case was present as disciplinary committee members, who are the director of joint and several personnel division.

The name of disciplinary action: On May 29, 2017, the Plaintiff expressed that the body of the pre-permanent unit D (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) was wrong (hereinafter referred to as “Disciplinary Reason 1”; - on June 26, 2017, the victim’s high-speed E-dong, which is the victim’s high-speed meals, shall not be good; hereinafter referred to as “the 2nd anniversary of the 2nd century”; - On June 27, 2017, the Plaintiff instructed the victim to take a 1string time with his/her accommodation on May 29, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “Disciplinary Reason 2”; - the victim’s 1string time and 20th half of the 2nd century (hereinafter referred to as “victim 3”); - the victim’s 1string time and 2nd half of the 20th century (hereinafter referred to as “victim 20th of the 2nd century”); and the victim’s 2nd of the 3rd.