logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2014.11.26 2014고단574
변호사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and ten months.

The cash confiscated by the defendant (50,000 won, six consolidations) 30,000 won shall be increased.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while serving as the head of the Korea Rural Community Corporation D branch from January 27, 2010 to December 31, 2010, was retired from office on January 1, 2012, and then, from May 2012 to May 201, 2012, the Defendant, a production company, such as pumps, is called “broki” and “F” is the representative director of the Korea Rural Community Corporation E.

1. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act;

A. On September 10 to October 2012, the Defendant related to the “G Project” project ordering the Korea Rural Community Corporation D branch office of Korea Korea Korea Rural Community Corporation proposed that “F, at the office in charge of the bid process of the D branch office in Gyeonggi-do, requested the executives and employees in charge of the D branch office in charge of the L 701, “G Project” pumps construction project ordered by the D branch office, which is scheduled to be ordered by the D branch office, shall be ordered by a free contract, and the F accepted the said proposal.

Accordingly, the Defendant, at that time, has been working as the head of the D branch in the D branch in I at that time, solicited to the effect that “The D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office, which “The D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office, would be able to receive the said construction work by a free contract, and around December 21, 2012, ordered the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the D branch office in the F branch office in the contract of KRW 1,100,000,000

As a result, the defendant received a total of KRW 184,791,940 under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for the affairs handled by the officers and employees of the Korea Rural Community Corporation who are deemed public officials.

B. On May 6, 2012, the Defendant related to the “LL business” project, at the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., proposed, “F, upon request of a public official in charge of bidding in the case of D, that “L business,” which is scheduled to place an order in the above city, may be awarded to the public official in charge of bidding in a negotiated contract, and approximately 20% of the construction cost shall be changed to a honorarium,” and F accepted the said proposal.

arrow