logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.06.10 2014고단587
변호사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

175,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The amount equivalent to the above additional charges.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 587]

1. F related to the order d drainage pumps and E drainage pumps rearrangement works in order to carry out business activities for the contracting companies in the capacity of the KG, which are the producing companies, and the Defendant and F are in the ex post facto relationship with the high school.

On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant received a proposal from F to the public official in charge of ordering construction works at Seosan-si, and accepted 10% of the construction cost as an honorarium, if he/she would be able to receive a contract by a private contract at the time of the conclusion of the contract, so that the KG would be able to receive a contract at the time of the conclusion of the contract.

Accordingly, around that time, the Defendant solicited the public officials H et al. in charge of ordering construction works to the effect that the L Co., Ltd. may receive a contract for the said construction works from the public officials in charge of ordering construction works. On June 1, 2012, the period in which the L Co., Ltd. issued an order to the L Co., Ltd. for the installation and improvement project for the D Co., Ltd. to the L Co., Ltd., for the construction cost of KRW 5,500,000,000,000,000 in cash around May 2012 and KRW 55,000,000,000,000,000 in cash from F, in return for soliciting or arranging the construction works.

As a result, the defendant was given KRW 95 million under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the affairs handled by the public officials.

2. On July 2012, the Defendant, with respect to the Korea Rural Community Corporation’s project for the improvement of drainage of the I district of the I district, received a proposal from F that “Around July 2012, the Defendant would pay approximately 15% of the construction cost as an honorarium, so that the Plaintiff may receive a contract for the project for the improvement of drainage of the I district, which is scheduled to order from the public corporation ordering the Korea Rural Community Corporation main office (hereinafter “chilling branch office”) to the person in charge of the construction work of the Korea Rural Community Corporation.”

Accordingly, the defendant around that time is the executiveJ of the Korea Rural Community Corporation and the Mountainous District Corporation.

arrow