1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts and the part concerning which the plaintiff emphasized at the court of first instance or claimed an additional claim, and thus, citing this in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(Other, the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial does not significantly differ from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance trial is examined, the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [In the second and third instances of the first instance judgment, each of the “28 February 27, 2017,” which read “27 February 27, 2017,” respectively.

The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 1B.

An appeal (from 2, 15 to 3, 8) shall be brought in as follows:

B. On November 11, 2016, the court rendered a judgment of conviction on criminal facts, such as “D, E, etc., the supply of a general truck is restricted by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport notification, etc., and thus, the supply of a special-purpose truck, which is permitted, as if it were a general truck, was a general truck. From March 3, 2010 to April 1, 201, the court made an error in the column for the registration certificate of a non-specific truck in the remarks column for the registration certificate of a motor vehicle for the instant special-purpose type of motor vehicle, such as the instant truck, and changed the copy of the registration certificate of a special-purpose truck by copying it, and then, the court rendered a judgment of conviction against the criminal facts of the FF Association employees in charge of the scrapping of the large-scale truck by submitting it by facsimile along with the application form for the repair of the large-scale truck to the general truck (No. 2016No963).

On the 3rd judgment of the first instance court, the 10th "special truck allowed to be supplied" is allowed.