beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts used or added as follows, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(Other matters alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance and the trial are examined, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [Article 1-1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.]
B. Paragraph 2) (2) (2) (2) is deleted; 3.5 (2) of the judgment of the first instance is deleted; 3.5 (3) of the judgment of the first instance is deemed to be “2; 5.8 (4) of the judgment; 3.5 (5) of the judgment below is deemed to be “3”; 5.4 of the judgment of the first instance is deemed to be “4.” 6.12 of the judgment of the first instance is deemed to be “non-social norms.” 21-2 of the judgment of the first instance, “A loan of KRW 130,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00).
The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance No.2
B. 3) B (2) (2) of the first instance judgment from 28 to 29 pages 1) are as follows.
B) We examine whether there was a procedural error in the procedure that does not apply the personnel management system to the dismissal of the instant case. (1) As seen earlier, the dismissal of the instant case was conducted as of December 21, 2016, the following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the above evidence and evidence Nos. 28, and Nos. 31, and 333. (AU and AV trade union C branch of this case prepared the “Agreement on Merger” in relation to the merger between the former C and B on July 13, 2015, and merged under Article 2(1).